Friday, May 09, 2008

Practice Random Acts of Twitter | Friday Flickr Fix | 05.09.08

Randomactsofkindness
Admit it. At some point, in some form or another…Twitter pisses you off. I’ve been there and back.

That’s from a post detailing why I think Marketing and PR people should try Twitter. Rather than cross-posting it here, I’ll build on it.

People are time-starved and don’t want to spend more time online than they have to. In the wake of an endless stream of shiny new sites we simply HAVE to check out, the magic question becomes: What value does Twitter add to your life?

For me it’s the higher level of interaction, online and offline, with other professionals. I was running out of steam with this blog. Twitter connected me with several people and got me engaged in a variety of industry conversations. The offline meet ups in particular gave me a second wind as they "complete the circuit that social networking communities establish virtually." Via Angelo Mandato.

In addition to meeting new people via Twitter, it turns out you can also win contests. Billy Fairchild was running a contest as a way to connect with more folks online. I was unaware of the contest, but was automatically entered when I began following him on Twitter. It turns out I won the grand prize. How cool is that? I’d been meaning to replace my old web cam so it will be a lot of fun playing with this “random act of Twitter.”

If you haven’t already, check out Twitter. It’s a handy utility and one example of how professional communicators are getting more directly involved in the conversation.

so happy together uploaded by Mr. Mark
tags | public relations | PR | marketing | | Twitter

Monday, May 05, 2008

Social Media Breakfast(s)

Smb050108_2 Last week I was reminded of Twitter’s utility and the importance of breakfast. In addition to the meal’s obvious nutritional benefits, two breakfast meetings helped feed my social media POV.

No one blinked when Albert Maruggi held the first Cincinnati Social Media Breakfast across the river in Kentucky. Perhaps this is because Cincinnati’s airport is also located in Northern Kentucky?

The Tuesday morning meeting was well-attended – even bringing a few folks up from Louisville. As a result, Jason Falls and I finally met. I need to reciprocate the road trip at some point.

Twitter was the hot topic of conversation due to its current novelty (more on that later). Twitter is how I learned about both breakfasts – the night before each one.

The group also discussed social media’s impact on the news. News tends to break on Twitter a few minutes before it hits mainstream media. A few people at the breakfast from the media and with media backgrounds reminded everyone that the media want accuracy first, then speed.

Social media geeks, including myself, often mention that giving up control online means gaining permission to make mistakes. However the media aren't given this luxury.

Think about this as we evolve into the newsroom of the future – are mainstream media held to a double standard?

A huge thank you to Albert for organizing the event and for suggesting I continue Cincinnati Social Media Breakfasts. As it’s complementary to the New Media Cincinnati meetups, I’m planning another event.

Friday morning I met up with David Armano, Krista Neher and Andrew Paradies from Photrade.

The smaller group allowed for some more great conversation. Twitter was still a topic, but we also talked about social media's impact on business.

The best part of these meetings of course is simply connecting in person. This quote from Angelo Mandato says it all: “The physical meetups complete the circuit that social networking communities establish virtually.”

So to all you coasties...if you ever have a lay over in "fly over country," get local and look up your industry online to connect offline. You'll get more than a free drink out of it.

tags | public relations | marketing | | Social Media Breakfast

Saturday, April 26, 2008

Hire Josh Rodamer

Hire Josh Rodamer
Josh is a senior majoring in PR and speech communications and graduates in two weeks. I'm showing NKU PRSSA how easy it is to create online content.

------
Sent via iPhone

UPDATE: Josh's LinkedIn Profile is here.

Friday, April 25, 2008

GO. PLAY. | Friday Fun/Flickr Fix | 04.25.08

GiddyupI’m headed to Keeneland with my firm for our annual employee celebration. So I thought it only fair to send you some Friday Fun/Time-Wasting Links. giddyup

1) Beat Boxing Basset Hound | Too much fun. Via The Lab.

2) Get Out And Play | Creative marketing entertainment. Via n-gage

3) TypeRacer | The most productive of the lot. Via @MattStaggs

Horse Racing #2 uploaded by brianpoulsen

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

Getting Social Means Getting Uncomfortable – At First

GrohlIn the aftermath of a blessed event, Jason Falls asks the question how personal is too much?

We in the social media space offer our professional lives up as open books. Some of us disclose minimal personal information. Others put up boundaries and clearly separate what is social currency and what is not. So long as our level of comfort is supported by our family and friends, I see little concern.

But how much is too much? >SNIP< All of these questions beckon to be answered as we all grow into this still new dimension of the greater media mix. Personal publishing and the social web give us unprecedented opportunity but with equally as unprecedented exposure. Where will the line be drawn to determine what is and is not for the offing?

As I commented on Jason’s blog, I think this is one of the ways communications is changing. As we evolve from broadcasting our clients’ messages to participating more in the communication process, the walls between business and personal begin to blur. How much personal detail marketers disclose will vary from person to person and culture to culture. When doing business in China, for example, you’ll get much more personally involved.

"Enough About Me. Let’s Talk About You. What Do You Think About Me?"
By the nature of our jobs, most of us don’t want to be the center of attention. It makes us nervous and we have to be careful not to make it all about us. So how much is too much? It will vary from person to person. But as Jason Falls shows us the key to figuring it out is based on personal experience.

Image007 uploaded by wallofhair
tags | public relations | PR | social media | marketing | Jason Falls

Friday, April 18, 2008

Is Your Brand Sticky or Slippery Online?

Bubbles

As information disperses wildly/widely through personal channels, marketers must revert from “sticky” mentality to “slippery.” Sticky websites require lures and hooks to get people to our sites and then lock them in. Slippery ideas enable wide distribution of our brand into daily life (Originally articulated by Mark Earls via Fallon’s Aki Spicer).

A client, er, someone might ask -- why create profiles on video/photo sharing sites and social networks when you have a perfectly good website?

The answer to this question is the Jeep Experience site. The Jeep brand planted its flag on Facebook, MySpace, YouTube and Flickr over time. Rather than a heavy-handed approach, Jeep merely facilitates online fan gatherings and consumer-generated Jeep content.

Jeep now aggregates all of this content at the Jeep Experience. It brilliantly illustrates the slippery over sticky approach. Back in the (dot com) day, a brand would try and build the Jeep Experience site and spend tons of money attracting eyeballs. It would cost you twice as much and be half as effective. This is generous math if you consider Bud.TV as a more recent example of a sticky content play.

Even more recently, Tommy Hilfiger launched TommyTV. Music is being used to sell everything from coffee to deodorant, so why not clothes as well?

TommyTV has the right goal -- to make an emotional connection with its customers. But the execution still feels like a brand hoping the sticky approach works instead of giving up control. TommyTV has a YouTube presence, but it’s downplayed on the site.

So clean up your act online and go from sticky to slippery like Jeep (who gets the Gallant). For trying to have its cake and eat it too/2.0, TommyTV gets the Goofus.

Bubble Rain uploaded by jurvetson
tags | Jeep | TommyTV | Bud.TV | advertising | marketing | consumer-generated media | brand

Monday, April 14, 2008

Biting Hands That Build Feeds

Biting_hands_that_build_feedsNo, it’s not about you.

Props to the ringmaster of reality checks, Jeremy Pepper, for inspiring this cartoon.

Comic via Build Your Own Meat

Saturday, April 12, 2008

Going Local: New Media Cincinnati Meet Up

CincypostMy online network began when Tom Murphy found my then freshly-minted blog, introduced himself and pointed me to Phil Gomes.

Nearly six years later, I’ve meet a lot of people from the marketing industry – online and in real time. But the past week has reminded me that there’s such a thing as too much focus.

At this month’s New Media Cincinnati Meet Up, I connected with several folks I‘d met online through Twitter, Facebook and blogging. And there were even more people there who I’m looking forward to getting to know.

Hometown Proud
So while I was building an industry network that “spans the globe” (that unintentionally sounds dramatic), I was missing a lot going on in my own backyard. By adding Twitter and Facebook to my online habits, I've connected with a much larger circle of Cincinnati social media.

In addition to the more well-known companies like P&G and personalities like Nielsen Buzzmetrics’ Pete Blackshaw, we have startups like Pimp My News and Photrade. I’m not surprised, just happy to officially join the fray.

On the blog front I’ve added several to my Cincinnati folder in my RSS reader. From research and wine to podcasters, vloggers and local development, there’s a lot of content being created.

What's my point? Just because social media allows you to go deep on micro-niche content, don't forget to blend in some breadth.

tags | New Media Cincinnati

Monday, April 07, 2008

Can PR Save the Beijing 2008 Olympics?

TinkerbellA handful of PR agencies are up for work around the Beijing 2008 Olympics, including "public relations strategies to be used before the games, media background and market analysis on how China is perceived in the West." Via Mediabistro

OK, before I give my perception, I’ll invoke tenets from two other PR bloggers.

Gomes Eighth Law of PR: "No amount of PR—no matter how carefully or strategically applied—will help a faulty or underperforming product in the long term."

Lally’s Tinkerbell Marketing Principle: "At one point in the play, Peter’s little fairy friend Tinker Bell starts to … well (cover the kids’ eyes) … die. The only thing that can save Tink is if the children believe in her. SNIP That’s the way some marketers think. If you only believe enough, everybody else will believe too. Then it will be true. Then all will be well"

So WTF kind of strategy would YOU propose to sell an Olympics being held in a country where even the Dali Lama cannot intervene to stop the abuse of human rights?

David Parmet notes, "This is not a PR problem, this is a humanity problem. If your clients are in bed with China, don’t be surprised to find yourself covered in fleas."

Yeah, playing off that, the Olympic Committee made their bed when they chose China to hold the event. Short of ending the human rights abuse, what could a PR firm possibly do to solve this problem for China? Some heads of state are boycotting the Olympics. The PR agencies should as well.

UPDATE: The New York Times provides insight into the Pro-Tibet PR strategy in the article Tibet Backers Show China Value of P.R.

tags | public relations | PR | Beijing Olympics | human rights

Friday, April 04, 2008

Get Social | Friday Flickr Fix | 03.04.08

SupOne of the things I (sometimes) miss from my agency days is writing case histories. It was getting tough to spin the problem/solution/results formula after several years, but it gave me first-hand access to my clients’ customers. That access always made it easier to find an interesting angle to the story.

In a recent post at the other blog, I noted that the toys are fun, but social media is more about conversations than technology.

We have to move from being broadcasters, pushing out carefully scripted messages, to being brokers. This means participating more directly than we’re used to, in plain view of our clients’ customers and giving up control of the messages.

Not everyone, or every client, can handle that.

Shake hands, Mo'Fo'! uploaded by nietsdoener/

Disclaimer: The views expressed on this site are my own and do not reflect those of my employer or its clients. ©

Featured in Alltop
Enter your Email


Powered by FeedBlitz

My Twitter Feed

    follow me on Twitter